Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Elimination of the former Umbric subgroup in Inceptisols

Rick Livingston
June 25, 1999 02:13AM
Mr. Mayhugh,

I support the intent of your proposal. I do not have a
preference concerning the naming conventions and that is not
the important issue (in my opinion).
Provisions for the former Umbric subgroup should be
preserved no matter how it is named.

Thank you for your concern in this matter. I hope that you
will persue your proposal. Please don't wait too long for
comments or responses from others. This matter seems to be
a subject of little concern to the folks that eliminated
this subgroup to begin with.
Subject Author Views Posted

Elimination of the former Umbric subgroup in Inceptisols

Rick Livingston 790 November 05, 1998 02:01AM

Re: Elimination of the former Umbric subgroup in Inceptisols

Stephen G. Carpenter 581 November 18, 1998 06:44AM

Re: Elimination of the former Umbric subgroup in Inceptisols

David Rossiter 531 December 04, 1998 03:00AM

Re: Elimination of the former Umbric subgroup in Inceptisols

Richard E. Mayhugh 537 May 03, 1999 10:39AM

Re: Elimination of the former Umbric subgroup in Inceptisols

Roy Vick 512 May 12, 1999 08:10AM

Re: Elimination of the former Umbric subgroup in Inceptisols

Roy Vick 412 May 12, 1999 08:12AM

Re: Elimination of the former Umbric subgroup in Inceptisols

Rick Livingston 465 June 25, 1999 02:13AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login